Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Washington » Court of Appeals Division II » 2012 » State Of Washington, Respondent V. Calvin S. Cardwell, Appellant
State Of Washington, Respondent V. Calvin S. Cardwell, Appellant
State: Washington
Court: Court of Appeals Division II
Docket No: 38684-4
Case Date: 01/31/2012
 
DO NOT CITE. SEE GR 14.1(a).


Court of Appeals Division II
State of Washington

Opinion Information Sheet

Docket Number: 38684-4
Title of Case: State Of Washington, Respondent V. Calvin S. Cardwell, Appellant
File Date: 01/31/2012

SOURCE OF APPEAL
----------------
Appeal from Thurston Superior Court
Docket No: 05-1-02325-6
Judgment or order under review
Date filed: 12/19/2008
Judge signing: Honorable Anne Hirsch

JUDGES
------
Authored byChristine Quinn-Brintnall
Concurring:Marywave Van Deren
J. Robin Hunt

COUNSEL OF RECORD
-----------------

Counsel for Appellant(s)
 Manek R. Mistry  
 Backlund & Mistry
 203 4th Ave E Ste 404
 Olympia, WA, 98501-1189

 Jodi R. Backlund  
 Backlund & Mistry
 203 4th Ave E Ste 404
 Olympia, WA, 98501-1189

Counsel for Respondent(s)
 Carol L. La Verne  
 Thurston County Prosecutor's Office
 2000 Lakeridge Dr Sw Bldg 2
 Olympia, WA, 98502-6045
			

    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

                                       DIVISION  II

STATE OF WASHINGTON,                                             No.  38684-4-II

                             Respondent,

       v.

CALVIN SCOTT CARDWELL,                                     UNPUBLISHED OPINION
                                                        AFTER REMAND FROM THE
                             Appellant.               WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT

       Quinn-Brintnall, J.   --   Calvin Cardwell appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of 

marijuana with intent to deliver, arguing that the search of his car was unlawful under Arizona v. 

Gant, 556 U.S. 332, 129 S. Ct. 1710, 173 L. Ed. 2d 485 (2009).  In our earlier opinion, filed on 

March 9, 2010, we concluded that Cardwell could not challenge the search for the first time on 

appeal.1 But the Washington State Supreme Court held otherwise in State v. Robinson, 171 

Wn.2d 292, 253 P.3d 84 (2011), and remanded Cardwell's appeal to us for further consideration.  

Cardwell and the State have filed an agreed motion on the merits to reverse under RAP 18.14(d) 

and (e)(2), contending that under Robinson, the evidence seized from Cardwell's car must be 

suppressed.  We agree and remand to the trial court with instructions to suppress the evidence 

seized from Cardwell's car and conduct further proceedings as appropriate.  As we held in our 

1 We reversed his conviction for bail jumping in that opinion for lack of evidence. 

No. 38684-4-II

earlier opinion, we remand Cardwell's bail jumping conviction to the trial court with instructions 

to dismiss it.

       A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the 

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, it 

is so ordered.

                                                 QUINN-BRINTNALL, J.
We concur:

HUNT, P.J.

VAN DEREN, J.

                                               2
			

 

Washington Law

Washington State Laws
Washington Court
    > Washington State Courts
Washington Labor Laws
    > Washington State Jobs
Washington State
    > Washington County Jail
Washington Tax
Washington Agencies
    > Washington DMV

Comments

Tips