DO NOT CITE. SEE GR 14.1(a).
Court of Appeals Division II
State of Washington
Opinion Information Sheet
Docket Number: |
38684-4 |
Title of Case: |
State Of Washington, Respondent V. Calvin S. Cardwell, Appellant |
File Date: |
01/31/2012 |
SOURCE OF APPEAL
----------------
Appeal from Thurston Superior Court |
Docket No: | 05-1-02325-6 |
Judgment or order under review |
Date filed: | 12/19/2008 |
Judge signing: | Honorable Anne Hirsch |
JUDGES
------
Authored by | Christine Quinn-Brintnall |
Concurring: | Marywave Van Deren |
| J. Robin Hunt |
COUNSEL OF RECORD
-----------------
Counsel for Appellant(s) |
| Manek R. Mistry |
| Backlund & Mistry |
| 203 4th Ave E Ste 404 |
| Olympia, WA, 98501-1189 |
|
| Jodi R. Backlund |
| Backlund & Mistry |
| 203 4th Ave E Ste 404 |
| Olympia, WA, 98501-1189 |
Counsel for Respondent(s) |
| Carol L. La Verne |
| Thurston County Prosecutor's Office |
| 2000 Lakeridge Dr Sw Bldg 2 |
| Olympia, WA, 98502-6045 |
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION II
STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 38684-4-II
Respondent,
v.
CALVIN SCOTT CARDWELL, UNPUBLISHED OPINION
AFTER REMAND FROM THE
Appellant. WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT
Quinn-Brintnall, J. -- Calvin Cardwell appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of
marijuana with intent to deliver, arguing that the search of his car was unlawful under Arizona v.
Gant, 556 U.S. 332, 129 S. Ct. 1710, 173 L. Ed. 2d 485 (2009). In our earlier opinion, filed on
March 9, 2010, we concluded that Cardwell could not challenge the search for the first time on
appeal.1 But the Washington State Supreme Court held otherwise in State v. Robinson, 171
Wn.2d 292, 253 P.3d 84 (2011), and remanded Cardwell's appeal to us for further consideration.
Cardwell and the State have filed an agreed motion on the merits to reverse under RAP 18.14(d)
and (e)(2), contending that under Robinson, the evidence seized from Cardwell's car must be
suppressed. We agree and remand to the trial court with instructions to suppress the evidence
seized from Cardwell's car and conduct further proceedings as appropriate. As we held in our
1 We reversed his conviction for bail jumping in that opinion for lack of evidence.
No. 38684-4-II
earlier opinion, we remand Cardwell's bail jumping conviction to the trial court with instructions
to dismiss it.
A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the
Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, it
is so ordered.
QUINN-BRINTNALL, J.
We concur:
HUNT, P.J.
VAN DEREN, J.
2
|