Court of Appeals Division II
State of Washington
Opinion Information Sheet
Docket Number: |
38498-1 |
Title of Case: |
State Of Washington, Respondent V. Kevin Cross, Appellant |
File Date: |
01/31/2012 |
SOURCE OF APPEAL
----------------
Appeal from Pierce County Superior Court |
Docket No: | 08-1-01990-1 |
Judgment or order under review |
Date filed: | 10/24/2008 |
Judge signing: | Honorable Bryan E Chushcoff, Susan Serko |
JUDGES
------
Authored by | Christine Quinn-Brintnall |
Concurring: | Marywave Van Deren |
| J. Robin Hunt |
COUNSEL OF RECORD
-----------------
Counsel for Appellant(s) |
| Rebecca Wold Bouchey |
| Attorney at Law |
| Po Box 1401 |
| Mercer Island, WA, 98040-1401 |
Counsel for Respondent(s) |
| Stephen D Trinen |
| Pierce County Prosecutors Ofc |
| 930 Tacoma Ave S Rm 946 |
| Tacoma, WA, 98402-2102 |
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION II
STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 38498-1-II
Respondent,
v.
KEVIN LEE CROSS, PUBLISHED OPINION
AFTER REMAND FROM THE
Appellant. WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT
Quinn-Brintnall, J. -- Kevin Cross appeals his jury convictions for first degree unlawful
possession of a firearm, gross misdemeanor harassment, resisting arrest, and obstructing a law
officer, arguing that the search of his car was unlawful under Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332, 129
S. Ct. 1710, 173 L. Ed. 2d 485 (2009). In our earlier opinion, filed on June 29, 2010, we
concluded that Cross did not preserve for review any error related to the vehicle search incident
to arrest.1 But the Washington State Supreme Court held otherwise in State v. Robinson, 171
Wn.2d 292, 253 P.3d 84 (2011), and remanded Cross's appeal to us for further consideration.
The parties agree that the proper remedy is to remand this matter back to the superior court for a
new suppression hearing.
1 Cross also challenged the sufficiency of the evidence and calculation of his offender score, which
we affirmed.
No. 38498-1-II
Accepting Cross's agreement with the State's argument that remand is the proper remedy,
we remand to the trial court for a suppression hearing and such further proceedings consistent
with Robinson as may be appropriate.
QUINN-BRINTNALL, J.
We concur:
HUNT, P.J.
VAN DEREN, J.
2
|