Preview:

Gooslin v. United States of America

Doc. 212

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON JAMES GOOSLIN, Movant v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-0001 (Criminal No. 2:05-00180)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Following entry of the Judgment on June 19, 2009, movant filed on June 24, 2009, his letter-form motion requesting the court and the government to administer to him a polygraph examination. Prior to a ruling on the motion, movant noticed an On May 6, 2010, the The mandate issued June

appeal of the Judgment on July 22, 2009. court of appeals affirmed the Judgment.

28, 2010, revesting the court with subject matter jurisdiction to address the June 24, 2009, letter-form motion.

The movant requests that he be administered a polygraph examination in aid of his contention that a law enforcement officer involved in the search in this case did not display a warrant to movant. To the extent the letter-form motion is not

properly treated as a prohibited, successive section 2255 motion lacking the prior sanction of the court of appeals pursuant to 28

Dockets.Justia.com

U.S.C.

Download 48783.pdf

West Virginia Law