Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » West Virginia » Supreme Court » 2012 » Patricia L. Garrett v. W. Va. Office of Insurance Commissioner/J. C. Penny Company (Memorandum Decision)
Patricia L. Garrett v. W. Va. Office of Insurance Commissioner/J. C. Penny Company (Memorandum Decision)
State: West Virginia
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: 11-0340
Case Date: 10/02/2012
Plaintiff: Patricia L. Garrett
Defendant: W. Va. Office of Insurance Commissioner/J. C. Penny Company (Memorandum Decision)
Preview:STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS PATRICIA L. GARRETT, Petitioner vs.) No. 11-0340 (BOR Appeal No. 2044746) (Claim No. 2008013212) FILED
October 2, 2012 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF INSURANCE COMMISSIONER and J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, Respondent

MEMORANDUM DECISION
Petitioner Patricia L. Garrett, by Michael Froble, her attorney, appeals the decision of the West Virginia Workers' Compensation Board of Review. J. C. Penny Company, by H. Toney Stroud, its attorney, filed a timely response. This appeal arises from the Board of Review's Final Order dated January 18, 2011, in which the Board affirmed a May 28, 2010, Order of the Workers' Compensation Office of Judges. In its Order, the Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator's February 27, 2009, decision denying Ms. Garrett's request to reopen the claim for consideration of temporary total disability benefits. The Court has carefully reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the petition, and the case is mature for consideration. Having considered the petition and the relevant decision of the lower tribunal, the Court is of the opinion that the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the Court determines that there is no prejudicial error. This case does not present a new or significant question of law. For these reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Revised Rules of Appellate Procedure. Ms. Garrett was employed as a hairstylist at J. C. Penny Company when she fell and sustained multiple contusions to her left side on September 23, 2007. The claim was held compensable for contusion of the left buttock, hip, and knee. While receiving treatment for her compensable injuries, Ms. Garrett intermittently complained of low back pain, although on examination there was no tenderness in her lower back. On December 11, 2008, Dr. Bachwitt performed an independent medical evaluation and diagnosed Ms. Garrett with a left hip contusion and a left knee contusion. He found that she was at maximum medical improvement
1

and recommended a 0% permanent partial disability award. He also found that she could continue to work without restriction. Ms. Garrett's treating physician diagnosed her with a low back strain for the first time on January 9, 2009, fifteen months after the compensable injury. On February 17, 2009, Dr. Thaxton performed a medical record review and found that it was not clear how Ms. Garrett's current pain was related to the compensable injuries. A September 28, 2009, lumbar spine MRI revealed multilevel facet degenerative changes and circumferential disc bulging at L4-5, which resulted in contact with the exiting right L4 nerve root. A November 30, 2009, lumber spine MRI also revealed mild disc bulging and degenerative changes. In its Order affirming the claims administrator's February 27, 2009, decision, the Office of Judges held that based upon the preponderance of the evidence, the claim should not be reopened for the consideration of temporary total disability benefits. Ms. Garrett disputes this finding and asserts that the claim should be reopened, per her treating physician's request. West Virginia Code
Download 11-0340.pdf

West Virginia Law

West Virginia State Laws
West Virginia Tax
West Virginia Agencies

Comments

Tips