Preview:

2001 WI 21
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
Case No.:

96-1821-CR

Complete Title of Case:

State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Roosevelt Williams, Defendant-Appellant.

ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Previously reported at: 225 Wis. 2d 159, 591 N.W.2d 823 (Wis. 1999) 214 Wis. 2d 412, 570 N.W.2d 892 (Ct. App. 1997) March 13, 2001 November 2, 2000

Opinion Filed: Submitted on Briefs: Oral Argument:

Source of APPEAL COURT: COUNTY: JUDGE:

Circuit Milwaukee Maxine A. White

JUSTICES: Concurred: Dissented: Not Participating:

PROSSER, J., concurs (opinion filed). BABLITCH, J., dissents (opinion filed). ABRAHAMSON, C.J., and BRADLEY, J., join dissent.

ATTORNEYS:

For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause

was argued by Warren D. Weinstein, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs was James E. Doyle, attorney general.

For the defendant-appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Melinda A. Swartz, assistant state public defender.

2001 WI 21
NOTICE
This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports.

No.

96-1821-CR : IN SUPREME COURT

STATE OF WISCONSIN State of Wisconsin,

Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Roosevelt Williams, Defendant-Appellant.

FILED
MAR 13, 2001
Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Supreme Court Madison, WI

REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals.

Reversed.

Download 17128.pdf

Wisconsin Law