1986 WY 7, 712 P.2d 355, Alonso v. State

State: Wyoming

Court: Supreme Court

Docket No: 85-89

Case Date: 01/08/1986

Alonso v. State
1986 WY 7
712 P.2d 355
Case Number: 85-89
Decided: 01/08/1986
Supreme Court of Wyoming

Cite as: 1986 WY 7, Wyo., 712 P.2d 355

GEORGE ALONSO, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT),

THE STATE OF WYOMING, APPELLEE (PLAINTIFF).

Appeal from the District Court of Laramie County; Joseph F. Maier, Judge.

Representing Appellant:

Leonard D. Munker, State Public Defender, and Martin J. McClain, Appellate Counsel, Wyoming Public Defender Program.

Representing Appellee:

A.G. McClintock, Atty. Gen., Gerald A. Stack, Deputy Atty. Gen., John W. Renneisen, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., and Nicholas Vassallo, Legal Intern.

Before THOMAS, C.J., and ROONEY*, BROWN, and CARDINE, JJ., and GUTHRIE, J., Retired.

* Retired November 30, 1985.

PER CURIAM.

[1.] Appellant was charged and convicted of forgery under 6-3-602(a)(ii), W.S. 1977 (June 1983 Replacement), and attempted forgery under 6-1-301(a)(i), W.S. 1977 (June 1983 Replacement). Appeal is taken from these convictions upon the theory that appellant could only have been charged under the credit card fraud section, being 6-3-802, W.S. 1977, 1985 Cum.Supp.

[2.] It is seldom that an appellant confronts a case so nearly identical as Hutchins v. State, Wyo., 483 P.2d 519 (1971), which involved the same statutes and contention. The same question was raised earlier this term in the case of Binger v. State, Wyo., 712 P.2d 349 (1986). Appellant in that case relied upon the same authorities as here argued and which this Court rejected. Disposal of this case is governed by the two before-mentioned cases.

[3.] Affirmed.

Citationizer Summary of Documents Citing This Document