Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Wyoming » 2006 » 2006 WY 73, 137 P.3d 124, JOHN DAVID PARKER V. THE STATE OF WYOMING
2006 WY 73, 137 P.3d 124, JOHN DAVID PARKER V. THE STATE OF WYOMING
State: Wyoming
Docket No: 05-275
Case Date: 06/21/2006

JOHN DAVID PARKER V. THE STATE OF WYOMING
2006 WY 73
137 P.3d 124
Case Number: 05-275
Decided: 06/21/2006


Cite as: 2006 WY 73, 137 P.3d 124


April Term, A.D. 2006

 

JOHN DAVID PARKER,

 

Appellant

(Defendant),

 

v.

 

THE STATE OFWYOMING,

 

Appellee

(Plaintiff).

 

Order Affirming the Judgment and Sentence of the District Court

 

            This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that appellant has failed to file a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court.  On April 19, 2006, appellants court-appointed appellate counsel filed a Motion to Withdraw as counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).  Following a careful review of the record and the Anders brief submitted by counsel, this Court entered its Order Granting Permission for Court Appointed Counsel to Withdraw and Conditionally Affirming Judgment and Sentence, on May 2, 2006.  That Order provided that the District Courts July 5, 2005, Judgment, Sentence and Order of Incarceration would be summarily affirmed unless the appellant, John David Parker, on or before June 15, 2006, raised points of his choosing that convinced this Court that the captioned appeal is less than wholly frivolous.  Taking notice that the appellant, John David Parker, has failed to file a brief or other pleading within the time allotted, the Court finds that the judgment and sentence in this matter should be affirmed.  Further, as noted in the Order Granting Permission for Court Appointed Counsel to Withdraw and Conditionally Affirming Judgment and Sentence, this matter will be remanded to the district court for entry of an order correcting the restitution provision of the Judgment, Sentence and Order of Incarceration.  The restitution provision should be corrected to indicate that the Division of Criminal Investigation is the victim in this matter.  See Merkison v. State, 996 P.2d 1138 (Wyo. 2000); W.R.Cr.P. 36.  It is, therefore,

 

ORDERED that the District Courts July 5, 2005, Judgment, Sentence and Order of Incarceration be, and the same hereby is, affirmed; and it is further

 

ORDERED that this matter is remanded to the district court for entry of an order correcting the restitution provision of the Judgment, Sentence and Order of Incarceration, to indicate that the Division of Criminal Investigation is the victim in this matter.

 

DATED this 20th day of June, 2006.

 

                                                           

            BY THE COURT:

 

                                                                        /s/ William U. Hill

                                                                        WILLIAM U. HILL

Chief Justice

Citationizer Summary of Documents Citing This Document


Cite Name Level
None Found.
Citationizer: Table of Authority
Cite Name Level
Wyoming Supreme Court Cases
 CiteNameLevel
 2000 WY 22, 996 P.2d 1138, MERKISON v. STATECited

Wyoming Law

Wyoming State Laws
    > Wyoming Gun Laws
Wyoming Tax
Wyoming Labor Laws
    > Wyoming at Work
    > Wyoming Jobs
Wyoming Agencies

Comments

Tips